Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Felix Gill vs Liam Gavrielides Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gill vs Gavrielides analysis and find out who is favored!
Felix Gill vs Liam Gavrielides Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gill 0 - 0 Gavrielides
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gill has won 52.46% of points on their second serve, while Gavrielides has won 46.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gill, in recent form, has won 52.04% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gavrielides has won 54.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.29% and 34.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gill has saved 60.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gavrielides has saved 60.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gill has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 54/ 27), with Gavrielides winning 51.43% (W/L 36/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 112/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Gavrielides has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 12/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Gill has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 26/ 15), where as Gavrielides has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.9% of matches (W/L 33/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gill has played against opponents with an average rank of 265.16 while Gavrielides has played against players with an average rank of 159.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gill has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gavrielides has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gill has converted 45.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gavrielides has converted 47.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
311
Rank
306
High
22
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
605
Rank
605
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
62% (139-87)
Career Total W/L
52% (64-60)
62% (21-13)
YTD W/L
51% (18-17)
$25,500
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gill VS Gavrielides H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Felix Gill | Liam Gavrielides |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (21/13) | 51% (18/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (49/31) | 52% (42/39) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (398/346) | 52% (390/360) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 55% (6/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (17/11) | 56% (10/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 95 | 135 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 86 | 77 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:48 | 1:38:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 269.5 | 200.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1455/2370) | 59% (1286/2162) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (983/1455) | 70% (895/1286) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (480/915) | 46% (406/876) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (112/248) | 47% (100/211) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (975/2378) | 42% (900/2163) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (21/13) | 0% (0/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (18/14) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (21/34) | 52% (17/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 42% (5/12) | 46% (6/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (23/20) | 75% (20/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (23/3) | 25% (20/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 13% (15/2) |
Felix Gill Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Felix Gill
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Felix Gill
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Tristan Lamasine
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Mohamed Safwat
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
37%
(
15 of
41)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Felix Gill
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
40%
(
29 of
73)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Mathias Bourgue
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Jan Hrazdil
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Felix Gill
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Robert Strombachs
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Liam Gavrielides Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano D'Agostino
Player
Liam Gavrielides
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
42%
(
14 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
35
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Liam Gavrielides
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefan Popovic
Player
Liam Gavrielides
81%
(
60 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Peter Buldorini
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Yannik Kelm
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
George Lazarov
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Liam Gavrielides
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Alexander Frusina
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Milos Mikovic
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Ruben Hartig
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gill Vs Gavrielides Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
